[jb1991]

open source means the source is.. open. It does not mean the source is necessary free. These two points are not in conflict.

[jahewson]

That is not how we define open source. See:

https://opensource.org/osd

Openness is much more than “source available”. Open for use by others is an important part of that.

[jb1991]

"unlicensed open source" exists, however -- it is a real thing, referred to as open source, despite that it cannot be used legally.

i.e. https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/software-security/unlicensed-...

[amrocha]

That's not how I've decided to define open source. Looking forward to seeing that page updated!