[ratonofx]

This copyright "issues" are against the true nature of innovation.

By the means of Artificial INTELIGENCE, we must to accept a mind or intelligence is free to perceive external elements and use every stimulus to execute its own creative process.

The world is a perpetual iteration cycle amongst human beings. Good artists borrow, great artists steal.

[drcode]

This comment should be on the Wikipedia article for "parody indistinguishable from reality"

[Hnaomyiph]

Regardless, I think I agree. I use images from all sources as inspiration for my art.

I know people who have used my pieces for inspiration as well. Intelligence and creativity aren’t bound by IP law.

Why should AI be bound by it?

[ratonofx]

Yeah! You got what I meant... We have the opportunity to make a big leap by exploring a new Era of creativity provided these technological advances.

It's the same cynical people questioning if "machines going to replace people" didn't figure out that the machines need to build themselves first.

When machines build themselves (with no humans since conception), let's see how the "patent ideas" world wouldn't fall apart.

Until then, We can get our piece of Cake by augmenting our human creative process.

Sorry but I'm not the daydreamer here. I can't live under the false premise that Intelectual Property is something that would control the input(training, learning, etc.) for all the A.I. (created or to-be-created).

[sixothree]

If we are expected to believe AI have a "creative process" then they should abide by labor and copyright laws.