[phkahler]

I'd argue that is a terrible way to write it since it depends on the rollover to terminate. Using i >= 0 is less mental work but also requires that i be signed.

[ghoward]

Rollover on unsigned ints is well-defined in C.

[hbn]

I think their point is that it's less well defined in the average human's brain

When most people see 0 - 1 they don't immediately think 11111111111111111111111111111111

[ghoward]

We're talking about C, though. I hope the average human is not writing C.

[jcelerier]

the average person writing C is absolutely an average human in terms of relationship with mathematics

[xdavidliu]

if we used i >= 0 and someone were to come in and change "int i" to "unsigned i" or "size_t i", the result would be catastrophic

[Leherenn]

The same argument can be applied to GP's code with the added bonus it will cause UB at some point.