[wowokay]

True, I think the rhetoric and The article are focused on killing the negative concepts around remote. To the extreme in pointing out that most of the common tropes are not accurate. The problem is I don’t think anti-remote people understand that in some cases there whole team may want to be remote 100% of the time, and that it’s not right to be in the mindset that those team members should be forced to come into an office to satisfying there need for socialization, in fact unfortunately in that situation maybe they need to change fields or companies.

[A4ET8a8uTh0]

A lot of people have. There is a reason remote only job postings have such a high number of applicants. In a lot of ways, remote already won. The question for me is really as to whether that means that anyone worth their salt will stay at non-remote places and whether old corps will suffer a brain drain.