[paddlepop]

I think mainly that I do not envy the lawyer that has to make the service argument.

We could get lost in the technical details of why it is or isn't a service but ultimately they only need to prove that x person of the project knew about the issues, could have done something about it (like shut it down), and didn't do enough.

It was just the one contract wasn't it? i.e. someone was responsible for deploying the contract that inputs and outputs the blending between addresses. In this scenario, the other permission less stuff is theatre.