|
|
|
|
|
by Raziarazzi
1404 days ago
|
|
No, since the image itself is irrelevant. It matters how despised a person is by the general populace. Any slightly believable incriminating visual will do as an explanation if the public is already predisposed. Thankfully, these pictures are much better than anything Photoshop can produce. Sadly, it's a part of a larger trend where we're getting more and more tools to create, modify, and exchange information, while the tools for analysis and filtering information are at least 50 years behind. |
|