[godelski]

This begs the question of if you have a picture of a woman breast feeding is this going to be considered child exploitation?

The world is very complicated and our ML models aren't great at dealing with OOD or infrequent samples. Mistakes are going to happen, and this is okay, but we need to ensure that we have mechanisms that can quickly remedy these mistakes. There are countless people who have had far less recourse because their stories did not make international headlines. Your ability to go viral shouldn't highly correlate with your ability to solve mistakes.

[14]

That is a funny question because YouTube, aka google, has hundreds of breastfeeding videos that hardly seem educational but rather provocative in nature. You can go down that rabbit hole yourself if you choose but there are uploaders that upload dozens and dozens of these breastfeeding videos which doesn't seem to have any purpose but to show off breasts.

[psyc]

I can testify that while most of those were originally legit, at least a few of those in circulation originated as original content on paid porn sites. Fetish category: lactation. Off the top of my head, Katarina Hartlova, Nadine Jansen, and 'FTV Erika' were all on there with bullshit 'educational' subtitles.

[godelski]

I mean there is a big irony that you can find Nirvana's Nevermind album on google image search too. So it looks like Google has double standards.

[homeland221]

That is ok. Feminist stuff is allowed otherwise Google will be labelled as bigot racist. That scared them even more then law enforcement.