Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jmiskovic 1404 days ago
I like this explanation, but the first paragraph mixes up things. ADCs (and sometimes DACs) are parts of most micro-controllers, but those are never used for digital communication. The most low-level primitive is GPIO block (general purpose input/output). This block can be found on most of chip pins, and it does the conversion between analog voltage and digital bit (as well as value latching and some other functions). With just them and the CPU you could manually receive and send digital bits and build complete communication protocols in software.

Also even if your STM32 has ethernet support, you still need a PHY transceiver that accesses the physical medium (wire or optical bus). This project implements both inside the Pico and requires just 3 external resistors. Very impressive feat of engineering, but not something you'd deliver as a field product.

1 comments

DACs and ADCs are frequently used for digital communication - for anything RF/wireless they are a key part! Some high-speed SerDes receiver designs are even digitising using fast ADCs and DSP techniques internally now to do things like equalisation in the digital domain too, which is interesting (e.g. [1], [2]). Previously, slower (like 25Gbps and less) SerDes have tended to be purely analogue circuits until near the very end.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY2Dn4EDPiA

2. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8778136

I think the GP meant that you wouldn't normally want to try to use an ADC for digital communication because the general-purpose ADCs in, e.g. microcontrollers are either overkill (10 bits just to detect a level!?) or too slow (max sampling rate) to do high-performance I/O. You'd be better off using an existing protocol with just two voltage levels and the GPIO pins. You can make an analog circuit to transform the two voltage levels you do have into the (typically 0-5V) levels detected by the GPIO on the microcontroller.