[nextaccountic]

> these terms refer to the same thing

No, cursor is this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cursor_(databases) https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-cursors.html

I once did pagination using database cursors, which is something different than keyset pagination: The server would keep a cursor open and keep fetching more data from the same query. This enabled the system to have an interface similar to offset pagination (you get the first page, then the second page, etc) but without doing a new query for each page discarding the first n-1 pages per query

The downside is that it makes the server stateful, and doesn't scale (you would need to keep hundreds of cursors open if you had hundreds of simultaneous users)

[orf]

Words can have two meanings. Cursor pagination and key set pagination do indeed refer to the same thing.

database cursors are a different thing.

[quietbritishjim]

You are agreeing with the parent comment with a tone of disagreement.

They never said what "cursor pagination" is or used the term at all. In this chain of comments, yours is the first one to use the term.

The comment you're replying to, like the original comment in this chain, merely said that this post is not about using "database cursors" for pagination. Which is correct, and you agreed that this is a different thing.

[mbreese]

Yes words can have two meanings, but given the similarity of context between these two meanings, calling this cursor pagination is not a great idea. It screams of someone that didn’t know about database cursors (which is only one implementation method) trying to describe a method for web site pagination. I’m not blaming the author here for this, as they likely know the difference. But for a new developer trying to Google this, it will be very confusing.