|
|
|
|
|
by speedgoose
1403 days ago
|
|
It’s still better than using the same few passwords everywhere or having a system with the site name. Because you need only on website vulnerability, which is quite common, to compromise your passwords. It’s better to have a single unlikely point of failure than many guaranteed points of failure in my opinion. Chrome has a password manager but the key is stored for you, which is less secure because it’s not using a HSM (hardware security module) as far as I know. |
|