|
|
|
|
|
by natmaka
1404 days ago
|
|
> We have models. The models we use are the most pessimistic (linear no-threshold). The dispute is about whether we should use the more optimistic models (threshold). There are many subjects disputed, to begin with the way assessments are conducted, check for example http://csrp.jp/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/2013-UNSCEAR-Repor... More fundamentally check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl:_Consequences_of_the... > Coal fly ash. It's full of uranium and thorium Nobody here advocates coal. Renewables (wind, solar... power) don't emit such stuff. > In my opinion, the deaths from the evacuation are attributable to the tsunami, not to the power plant Most of those victims were attributed to the tsunami, the estimation quoted (2202 victims) quoted is only the small fraction of the victims (about 10%) which was attributed to factors (panic, effect on infrastructures of the evacuation...) induced by the nuclear disaster. |
|