| Oh god this hurts. The same sloppy arguing. Ok I was talking about literature. You just expanded it a whole lot, which diffuses the point I was making. I don't think this is a tactic, I just don't think you can focus. Nonethless, "It happens because our art and our philosophy [1] inspires our science and our engineering [2]" You conveniently assume [1] and [2] are divorced and each lies with two entirely divided castes. They are aspects of the same. "Law, government, peace, prosperity, human rights, ethics. These things all spring from the humanities" Oh lord. Law is from human nature. Desire for justice/fairness exists even in monkeys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg Peace - this comes from humanities? Justify this. ethics - nothing to do with law apparently, see above. prosperity - nothing to do with science, right. I've had enough of this crap. You can't debate, you don't want to look for common understanding. It's a kind of arrogance. |