|
|
|
|
|
|
by petewailes
1405 days ago
|
|
|
You're missing 37-38, 45, 53, 58, 73, 81 and 90, and that's just the ones I can't think of off the top of my head. I'm sure there's probably double that number I can't remember, because they don't intersect with my areas of professional study. 29 was huge (way bigger than 08), but many of those others were in the ballpark of 08 or larger. As far as I'm aware, it's unlikely we'll ever see another as large as 29, but 08 sized? I'd expect another within 30-50 years of it. |
|
|
From where I was standing, 08 was a setback.