|
|
|
|
|
by pbadams
1400 days ago
|
|
Even if the 'bug' of limited time off is solved, I think people's valuation of their time is still pretty high. The trains/airships would have to be quite nice (read: heavy, expensive, possibly less efficient) for you to be willing to spend so much time in them. On a sillier note, I wonder what the fastest speed you can reach is, in terms of timezones/hr. My guess was a polar route like ANC-HEL, but there don't seem to be any direct passenger flights. Condor flies ANC-FRA seasonally, which is pretty much exactly 1 hour time difference per hour of flight. Another possibility is TAS->URC, at 1.2. The author's routes, YVR-LHR and YVR-NRT, are both 0.8-0.9 hours difference per hour flight time, depending on direction. |
|
For 1 hour differences,
SI6604/5 between Jersey and Rennes is scheduled for 40 minutes and crossing a single zone, so 1.5 hours per hour.
In the US, South Bend Indiana to Chicago is only about 90 miles, but is scheduled for an hour, and has a 1 hour difference. Driving is far faster.
Flying between the diomedes is a 21 hour difference for a 3 mile trip, although I wouldn't advise it at the moment, a helicopeter could presumably do the trip in a minute or two, with a difference of about 100 hours per hour.
If you're willing to walk instead of flying you can cross 2 hour borders instantly quite easily at many places in the world. 2.5 or 3 hour differences probably exist too, but the big one from Afghanistan into China or 3.5 hours is not really a something you can do.