|
|
|
|
|
by teakettle42
1405 days ago
|
|
I don’t think it would actually be nice if the burden of proof rested on the accused. This example isn’t a study of systemic bias, and is both individually and statistically meaningless. It would be nice, however, if the paper of record didn’t call out a home appraiser, by name, in front of a national audience, with no evidence, as being a racist. |
|
A) the historical evidence about discrimination at every level in the housing system
B) the study from the brookings institute showing bias with housing appraisal
I’m also not claiming all of the burden of proof should lie with the accused.
What I am saying is given the anecdotes, lawsuits, and retrospective analysis, I think it’s fair to put more pressure on the system to help with investigating the issue more systematically.
Getting the type of statistical evidence you are talking about is expensive and I think there are enough indications that 0% of the cost seems like too low of a cost to expect a huge industry to cover.