[scarface74]

Let’s say I’m a corporation who gives marital benefits. But some of my employees can’t get married because the state doesn’t allow gay marriage. Should the corporation not take a stance?

Should corporations not have taken a stance about doing business in South Africa before apartheid was abolished?

[xwdv]

Taking a stance does nothing in either of these scenarios except send signals to people.

[scarface74]

So they shouldn’t extend health care benefits to an employees partners when they couldn’t legally get married?

Even paying for birth control as part of a woman’s health care benefit is consider political

[xwdv]

As a single man living in a single income household who also struggles to get married why don’t I get benefits to compensate for my lack of a partner?