Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Qem 1403 days ago
Like, mammals are very vulnerable to skin cancer. We lost some traits reptiles have that makes them cope better with UV.
2 comments

Animals in the wild don't typically die of cancer, so that's probably not much of an adaptation evolutionarily. Even if they did die of cancer, it would likely be after they've reproduced, which means there's no selective pressure to develop the adaptation.
> Animals in the wild don't typically die of cancer, so that's probably not much of an adaptation evolutionarily.

There's lots and lots of adaptations that repair damage to DNA and that deal with damaged cells. So there must have been lots of evolutionary pressure to keep them in place and keep them working.

Animals in the wild probably don't typically die of cancer, because those adaptations are in place.

But you are right, that even mammals active during the daytime have not (re)gained that specific photolyase DNA mechanism that their ancestors lost.

Wild animals do die of cancer and there are evolutionary pressures in regards to carcinogenesis.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eva.12025

Imagine a cold-blooded reptile with sun allergy.