[bjornsing]

So… That does not in any way clarify things. Is the parent right or wrong?

[tokai]

Seriously? The conclusion I quoted is easy unconvoluted language. I cannot imagine what could be changed to make it more understandable.

Over a period you have a reduction of the total deaths due to CHD - 11% of that reduction is due to a ban on trans fat.

[happyopossum]

It may be clear to you, but it's missing some context - it's 11% of the 75%, so really an overall 8% reduction. Using the number of 11% instead of 8% could be construed as trying to hype up the results.

[peyton]

Wrong. See tables 1 and 2.