|
|
|
|
|
by SomeBoolshit
1396 days ago
|
|
For use cases where you don't want to look away from the main task you're performing, it's definitely better than a regular touchscreen. You don't have to aim your finger at anything, you just have to scroll and check whether you're there, yet. And you'll start remembering how many notches you have to scroll to reach the functions you need, becoming less dependent on the screen at all. The difficulty is in balancing the number and arrangement of submenus and the buttons/menu entries triggering whatever function, although the same issue exists with regular touchscreens. |
|
Physical dials and buttons for all the important controls for, y'know, driving the car - but for stuff like interacting with maps, streaming music and all the other CarPlay/Android Auto apps - what you've described is exactly what they have, and I got used to it very quickly. Even though the touchscreen works at low speed, I never use it.
I'm sure there are other manufacturers who have resisted the urge to copy Tesla's omni-screen and I'd love to know who they are.