|
|
|
|
|
by throwawaylinux
1398 days ago
|
|
> Touch screens are just their 60+ year old fossils deciding "that's hip, that's what kids want!" Do you have any evidence for this? Seems pretty outlandish to me. > 1. It's cheaper to produce; 2. It looks more expensive, so the price goes up; 3. Testing audiences respond positively to shiny lights; 4. Fossils decided that this is what the young people want. What does 4 even mean? If we took 1-3 as fact, then should businesses have disregarded them and instead made something more expensive to produce that looked cheaper and sold for less because people don't respond so positively? |
|