[moritzwarhier]

Yes, I think it's specific to Google but only to a degree.

Google provides the most richely "enhanced" search experience, also but not only when using natural language queries.

I think you are right about the "Who decides what's right/correct" part.

But I thought the article's argument was kind of similar:

There are no clear-cut solutions, so search engines shouldn't pretend to be able to provide them.

Google often gives factually wrong or subjective "answers" to queries that use a natural-language question format, and presents them as fact.

Google's own AI-generated "Q&A" snippets and "Knowledge Graph" answers are presented as somewhat equivalent to the fact snippets that Google pulls from Wikipedia.

It is this kind of highlighted "knowledge answers" to arbitrary queries that the article talks about, I think.