[hot_gril]

Yes, those people are writing hardware emulators. Doesn't mean they're the only "real" kind.

As for my Intel CPU, it isn't pretending to be another kind of CPU. Intel makes a leading implementation of x86. Wine follows Microsoft's Windows implementation and translates to Linux calls, and the entire point is so you can run programs intended for Windows on Linux instead. You can get relative about it, but it's not really, they're clearly different. Either way, doesn't support WINE's acronym.

[littlestymaar]

> Yes, those people are writing hardware emulators. Doesn't mean they're the only "real" kind.

They're the only kind that doesn't involve a super broad definition of what the word “emulation” means (so broad that most computing actually fits in this definition).

> As for my Intel CPU, it isn't pretending to be another kind of CPU.

Until one day you realize that you can run an x86 program on a 64 bit CPU (but fortunately, this isn't done through “emulation” proper either).

[hot_gril]

> Until one day you realize that you can run an x86 program on a 64 bit CPU (but fortunately, this isn't done through “emulation” proper either).

It's reasonable to call that emulation if there's a separate layer for it translating to/from x86-64, rather than the hardware specifically supporting -32. My CPU isn't doing that cause I'm not running 32-bit software on macOS.

[sharpneli]

So AMD CPU’s are emulators then?

[hot_gril]

No they're not.