|
|
|
|
|
by zaphar
1405 days ago
|
|
Good luck figuring out a style that isn't "cribbing" off of another artists style. In which case if that becomes legal then the ML will just be used to generate unique styles which are similarly cribbing. There is no definition of "style" here you can rely on without causing just as much harm to human artists as you would be restricting AI art. Everything is derivative of something/someone else after all. |
|
Just like copyright today, even though the individual supposedly benefits from this scheme, it's companies who have greater stake in the outcome.