|
|
|
|
|
by rtpg
1403 days ago
|
|
Definitely. I was likely being too glib in my response here, and wasn't trying to say to throw all the nukes into the trash. I think that it is possible to maintain an existing set of weapons without trying to continue pushing the envelope towards even more destructive weapons, and that 5000 is a lot/enough. |
|
If anything I'd image modern research is more interested in things like precision, collateral damage reduction, etc.