Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stacktrust 1400 days ago
Wow. How would floor managers benefit from that kind of swap?
4 comments

Same way it happens outside china in other industries. You know a supplier who sells material / service for $BUDGET minus X, in exchange for swapping the PO you get a portion of X from the supplier via back channel means, while company is now paying $BUDGET for lower quality material / service that costs supplier less.
Because the factory manager is the one selling product out the back door.
By pocketing the difference.
Ah, pocketing the delta on input costs. Hopefully the drop in output QA metrics would be detectable via software.
You also need to make sure QA is actually on your side, and vigilant.

As they say, heaven is high and the emperor is far away.

They sell the higher spec ones on the side to their buddies?
Wouldn't the lower spec ones fail QA checks on factory floor?
And as the other posters tell you, possibly failing QA checks is not stopping profiteers from attempting these kind of changes. Constantly. It's a numbers game. Expected profit based on how long until your swap is discovered.
Not if the floor manager controls the factory floor QA checks...
If factory owners really want integrity from software-executed QA checks, they can require HQ authorization of software and config updates on factory floor equipment that is equipped for local tamper detection of control planes.