|
|
|
|
|
by xg15
1404 days ago
|
|
> It's like the model gets you the first 90%, and then you need a trained painter to get the second 90%. Call me a doomer, but I think this makes the possible consequences even worse. Remember the 80/20 rule. A lot of modern product innovation is not really about improving quality - rather, its about introducing lower-quality versions of existing products which are significantly cheaper than the original but still "good enough". Dalle2 and friends could fall into the same bucket. If they produce artwork that is objectively worse than a human-painted version would be, but still "good enough" for many mundane usecases - stock photos, concept art, etc - we might still see a wide adoption and displacement of human artists from those usecases - along with an overall drop in quality of artworks. |
|