[deltathreetwo]

It is always the case. Another fallacy that can only be the result of your flawed intuition.

All human capability has limits. You have limited strength and limited intelligence. There is no amount of intelligence or physical strength in a single human that can allow one man to build a feat of technology such as a Boeing 747. It can't even be done by one human in 10 lifetimes. This fundamental impossibility in your words is "always the case."

Yet there are individuals that exist in the world with enough wealth to buy several 747s. You will see that anyone with this amount of wealth could not have achieved this wealth through the sheer power of their individual IQ or physical strength. They had to have worked with many others in order to achieve such wealth. The existence of said individuals completely verifies the existence of how wealth is distributed unfairly. There is no fair barter that can allow one man to gain a 747 unless that man extracted work off the backs of others. It is logically impossible if this was not the case.

The only thing you can argue here is that wealth inequality is required for society to progress; but there is no argument on whether or not the resources are distributed fairly.

[epgui]

Even if everything you just said was true, it completely misses the point and is irrelevant to my comment.

[deltathreetwo]

Doesn't matter. It's true and what you said how it's "always the case" is categorically false. The falsehood of your comment is the only thing that is relevant here.

[epgui]

PS.: I don’t know what I said to trigger you, but you don’t need to continue posting arguments to other comments I make across various threads. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

[formulatwothree]

You did trigger me. Read your first reply to me. Your comment really pissed me off, it was intentionally rude. "New flash"

Either way it got me curious and I started reading your other comments and I realized you're just not a very nice person and highly mistaken about a lot of things. You're not very logical or scientific or academically inclined. So I just wanted to help you out and teach you some stuff that's all.

Just responded to a couple comments you made. Just trying to be informative. :)

[epgui]

I can accept that it was rude, and I apologize for that, but you should know that it wasn’t the intention.

[formulatwothree]

News flash! it was really rude and was intentionally so! Just like this statement.

But even if it wasn't rude, who cares. It's no longer relevant. We've both moved on.

[deltathreetwo]

It was the intention. You are lying to my face. The format: "News Flash: Statement of something obvious." is very rude. Implying I don't know the obvious thing.

I hold no grudges but your previous statement is a total lie. Don't pretend it wasn't intentional.