Totally agree - technologically possible. Now who’s ambition, will, and money are behind this to get those who are in the middle, don’t care, or need to look after themselves first in the ecosystem to get this done?
governments have been funding renewables left and right because it's a populist measure, and it creates jobs that guarantee voters. The dynamic is a positive feedback loop
on that front. Europe is subsidizing teslas. But one has to look at the downsides. Germany has overinvested in solar, but the results are feeble as it's not a sunny country and renewables are unreliable.
Even if there was an agreement on 100% renewables, i m certain it would get squandered in silly but popular projects such as solar curtains or rooftop
Maybe in american suburbs it makes more sense, but in old cities like europe electric grids are not designed to feed into the network, and the installations are small, thus no economies of scale. The money spent on subsidizing them would be better spent on large installations
Throw in a physicists who actually understands the difference between power, energy and time offset and the green grid plans that assume the sun shines at midnight underestimate the cost of replacing on demand power by two orders of magnitude.
You make the foolish assumption that theses "researchers" are not biased simply because you agree with the premise due to your own bias.
It is rather surprising to me how people who used to rail against the "evil corporation" now love them some evil corporation simply because evil corporations have been created to pilfer society through renewable energy.
It could be a scene from 1984; yesterday the people hate corporations they always have been at war with and always will be, today they have been told to love corporations and they do so with zealous mania.