|
|
|
|
|
|
by Quekid5
1404 days ago
|
|
|
Well, yes, but we were imagining a world with a sort of universal "about:", I think? You wouldn't even need that many basic types to cover about 90%+ of the state space. Of course, there would be bonus points if applications could define their own types in a UI-meaningful way. |
|
|