[boomboomsubban]

>It says absolutely nothing of the sort in the article. Seems like yet another assumption you are making.

Google's revenue is public knowledge, surely the ACCC is capable of using a search engine to find it.

>but please don't go around saying things that you don't know to be true.

I can't prove it, or perhaps I could if the ACCC has fined others for the same offense, but even without proof I'm not making an extraordinary claim. If a local delivery place had two separate toggles needed to stop them from tracking your order history, they'd be guilty of the same thing yet people would find a $60M fine ridiculous.