[newaccount2021]

Austin has more current permitted housing construction than any major metro in the nation

I see residential construction of all kinds (high density, low density) all over the city including in the middle of downtown

Austin will never be a dirt-cheap city, but it is cheaper than the Bay Area and they are actually trying to build

Yes, the result will be some sprawl but Texas is big and families do not want to live in apartments

[technofiend]

The killer from this sprawl growth is traffic. Austinites just need to look South to Houston to see what a huge urban area with limited public transportation looks like.

[readthenotes1]

They don't even need to leave the city. Just look at the SoCo

[karanbhangui]

minor nit: Houston is not south of Austin

[ClumsyPilot]

the reason you folks hate apartment is that you never seem to design them right. They can be spacious and nice to live in.

In ex soviet block countries apartments were surrounded by greenspace, courtyards, playgrounds, etc. you are not reliant on your garden

[muro]

Wow, putting eastern block apartments as an example is ... not great. Pretty much everyone who grew up in one was looking for ways to move out. Small, no noise insulation, shared space usually in a bad state - e.g. frequently broken elevators, bike rooms with no expectation your bike won't get stolen, lawn in front of the house with dirt paths (shortcuts), usually broken playgrounds. Things are better now - elevators usually work, lawns have tiny fences to avoid walking on them, but now it's dog shit all over the place instead, including playgrounds. I just don't believe shared big buildings / neighbourhoods work well.

[dalke]

Okay, then Swedish apartment buildings. It's clearly not the case "families do not want to live in apartments" here.

I've lived in apartments in the US (Tallahassee, Urbana IL, Mt. View, Santa Fe) plus visited others, and can say that the Swedish apartments I've lived (Gothenburg, Trollhättan) in have all been a step or two above their US equivalents.

We have basement space, with an exercise room, which is great for the kids to play in on a rainy day, or to have a party without disturbing the neighbors. Other apartment complexes often have a space which people can book for parties or other larger gatherings. Some even have a guest apartment, which you can book when you have visitors. (Essentially shares the cost of having a rarely used guest bedroom.)

There's solid walls, so we barely hear the neighbors under normal circumstances.

The rare times the elevator breaks, it's quickly fixed.

The shared laundry area is a bit of a nuisance because it needs to be booked. On the other hand, there's plenty of space for washing, drying (both tumble dryer and in a drying room), and a folding/ironing room.

Heat (via district heating) and insulation is excellent.

We don't have a green space as part of the apartment, but the nearest park is a block away, and several more parks are within easy walking distance. Many apartment buildings/complexes have their own small playground (default is a play platform with slide, sandbox, and swing), and again, with larger parks and greenspace nearby.

Since I'm centrally located, I don't need a car - walking, biking, and mass transit work well. Yes, I've had one bike stolen from me. Then again, given how much I've saved by not having a car (depreciation, insurance, gas, etc.) that's not the only factor. Plus, in the US I had one window shot out by a bored teenager with a BB gun, and two tires punctured by someone going around vandalizing cars.

Dog shit has not been a problem.

To be sure, there are many people who live in less dense regions of town, in row houses or detached houses, and have a car. My point isn't that everyone prefers apartments, but rather that apartments, and the areas around them, can be designed better than I'm used to in the US, and can absolutely work well.

FWIW, I live in a smaller city, with about 60K people. The apartment buildings are generally about 5 stories high - definitely not high-rises. Perhaps that's not what you mean by "big buildings", in which case my backup point is that this sort higher density housing is, for the most part, illegal or impossible to build in the US.

And yes, there's much bad to say about, say, the concentrated tower blocks from the Million Programme. I don't mean to say that all Swedish apartments are great, but rather that there's plenty of evidence that shared big buildings do work, in that people raise families there even when they have the option and means to move to single-family homes.

[CogitoCogito]

My girlfriend is Slovak and says she never wants to live in a high rise like those in her hometown. When I finally visited there I was a bit surprised. Sure there were many buildings and apartments that all looked the same pretty devoid of any individual character, but there were also bars, restaurants, stores right in the middle of all of it. I laughed and told here that regardless of what you think of the buildings, I'd say I've _never_ seen amenities placed better anywhere I'd ever lived in California.

Honestly I don't even disagree with your criticisms (broken elevators, bike theft, etc.), but that only makes it seem more pathetic that a place like California with so much more money can't do so much better. The zoning in California (and most of the US for that matter) really is terrible.

Edit: I want to be clear that I'm talking about the _wealthy_ areas of California. I'd say that this regular crappy building complex in a random city in Slovakia does better than almost all the rich parts of California. The poorer and/or more rural parts of California I'm totally ignoring here (though they're even worse).

[muro]

Hello from Slovakia :)

Fair point. I never lived in an apartment complex in California, so hard to compare. I stayed in a few in the bay area when on business travel, but those were very nice - shared space with a pool, gym, a coffee shop part of the building. No idea how those compare to normal apartments. I did live in apartments elsewhere: in Australia (except for really bad building quality), in Switzerland, Germany, Austria. They were nice, as long as they stayed reasonably small. Once they hit some 5 floors and 20+ apartments, they stopped being a place where I'd like to live. With up to 10 apartments, they were almost universally nice, no matter where.

[badpun]

I live in post-Soviet apartment block. It's either that or a (more expensive) house far away in the suburbs, where life probably would be worse - often no sidewalks and narrow streets, so walking isn't safe, far from anything interesting so lots of driving etc. Plus, all the maintenance work. I prefer the noise and occasional dog shit over that.

[neither_color]

I haven't been to ex-soviet countries but I've stayed in upper middle class "luxury" apartments in a few different Asian countries with lush amenities like gardens, pools, tennis courts, etc. In the end I just prefer a regular old suburban house. You trade walkability for privacy and comfort. Also something about high rise compounds with elevators annoys me. It's like you arrive home but you're still not home, you still have a mini commute through your compound.

[badpun]

> You trade walkability for privacy and comfort.

Yep, precisely. "Comfort" including being relatively noise-free, whereas in apartments, people are in worst cases forced to sell and move out because of inconsiderate neighbors. On the con side, suburban house will require regular maintenance , whereas in apartments there are people who automagically take care of that for you.

[ClumsyPilot]

|> "Comfort" including being relatively noise-free, whereas in apartments, people are in worst cases forced to sell and move out

Is it really impossible to sort out insulation in the 21st century? Like you can have censory deprivation rooms, why can't we put same material between units?

[Dma54rhs]

People absolute hate living in these commie blocks. I've lived there as a kid and it's worst design idea you could give regarding high density buildings.