[cato_the_elder]

> not universally considered a crime it

That doesn't make a difference for me, and most likely for many other people who are against late-stage abortions too. Not all of us are globalists.

If you consider the concrete facts of this particular case [1] (instead of framing it as an abstract privacy or healthcare issue), I think you'd have some sympathy with people who don't find it acceptable.

[1]: https://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/nebraska/nor...

[mikkergp]

If you’re not a globalist then wouldn’t you agree that Nebraska shouldn’t have jurisdiction to subpoena companies that aren’t incorporated in Nebraska? Your argument seems pro globalism

[abigail95]

There are soooo many reasons why using state lines cannot protect you from a criminal case.

Firstly, Facebook clearly operates in Nebraska, and is thus subject to its jurisdiction.

Incorporation (in Delaware) is for corporate covernance, not for dodging local laws.

[cato_the_elder]

No, Nebraska is part of the United States.

[mikkergp]

But Facebook isn’t incorporated in Nebraska

[cato_the_elder]

Yes, but the people in question are from Nebraska.

[0xbadcafebee]

But their data isn't in Nebraska.

If a person is accused of a crime in Georgia, and the person had a safe deposit box in Maine, the Maine bank doesn't have to immediately give Georgia police their possessions.

[leereeves]

Facebook has data centers in Nebraska, so it's possible that their data is in Nebraska.

But even if not, because Facebook has a physical presence in Nebraska, it is subject to Nebraska law.