Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by RonMarken 1409 days ago
Perhaps Twitter needs to make it easier to create accounts anonymously and stop virtue signaling (i.e suspend accounts created over Tor onion-service)

With pseudonymous usage of public services information minimisation to maintain operational-security against private user-data being disclosed by external hackers or rogue insiders is a mantra that needs to be followed religiously.

2 comments

I’m six months in and they haven’t asked for a phone number yet. I dread the day when they do. This is where proficiency in the Twilio API comes in handy.
Don't you still have to use an actual phone number when you sign up for Twilio?
If you trust twilio security policy you can defer the weakness of Twitter policy in favor of the strength of twilio.
when I started liking "too many" tweets I got hit with it and my mobile carrier (canada btw) refused to deliver txt msgs from Twitter so I could never get verified.
Lucky you. I can't create another twitter account as my number is on a network unreachable by their SMS system. Worst of both worlds for me as when that number was on another network they could verify. So leaked number that I cannot even use to verify a second business account :-(.
That's crazy. I can't remember the last time I wasn't straight up locked within 2 minutes of my first login.

Guess Linux users are bad, or whatever makes them trigger each f*ING time.

Created and accessed over Tor or a clearnet connection?
Virtue signaling? Preventing completely anonymously accounts doesn't seem to fit that colloquial definition of that, I always assumed it meant taking an action simply for social signalling, that has no benefit to you otherwise.
How about the fact Twitter recently launched an official onion-service yet it is claimed by users when attempting to create an account with email over it the account is locked for 'abuse' within short order?
I certainly understand why you want to use Tor to create a Twitter account, I guess the disconnect is you seem to feel it is fundamentally and obviously wrong to prevent this, but it does seem fairly clear why you'd offer a service to allow logins yet not signups. And in any case, can't speak to why an individual account got banned