[echelon]

I feel like we need a billion dollar prize for anyone who can demonstrate reproducible proof of vaccine dangers.

Simply stating that something is dangerous is easy for anyone to do. There's no skin in the game, no burden of proof, and most frequently no domain expertise.

[Vecr]

Verbatim from the fda.gov Package Insert for COMIRNATY (what the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is theoretically called in the US):

https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS 5.1 Management of Acute Allergic Reactions Appropriate medical treatment used to manage immediate allergic reactions must be immediately available in the event an acute anaphylactic reaction occurs following administration of COMIRNATY. 5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Although some cases required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential longterm sequelae. The CDC has published considerations related to myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination, including for vaccination of individuals with a history of myocarditis or pericarditis (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-consideration...).

How can I get in touch with you in regards to this prize?

[Johanx64]

That's ludicrous, people who are concerned about vaccine safety have the most direct 'skin in the game', as they decide if they agree to being injected some substance mix X, more over the burden of proof certainly isn't on them to prove it's not safe, quite the opposite.