[yunohn]

> If TF was generic, your tool wouldn't be needed.

This is unclear to me, and seems easily false. The problem lies with cloud provider idiosyncrasies, not the configuration layer.

[latchkey]

It is a fundamental issue with TF. It wasn't designed to support that. It isn't generic, it is very specific with the providers. Bolting a generic provider running on top of that isn't going to solve the underlying problems with TF/HCL.