|
|
|
|
|
by bananapub
1414 days ago
|
|
> Regarding source code, federal courts told the government it couldn't restrict the publishing of strong cryptography, which it considered a munition. ? you mean after Phil Zimmerman spent years in court, and then published a physical book of the source code? and the US government then sucessfully restricted export of actual software with above 56-bit keys for years[1]? to the extent that Debian and OpenBSD did all their opensource crypto work outside the US to avoid trouble? and they still explicitly ban export to "rogue states" and "terrorist organisations" in 2022[2]? things have improved since the 90s but it's still not unencumbered by the US government and the changes mostly happened to make US tech companies more competitive, not due to a desire to free anyone's speech. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th... |
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States
From your link: "the BIS must be notified before open-source cryptographic software is made publicly available on the Internet, though no review is required."