|
|
|
|
|
|
by huntr
1410 days ago
|
|
|
I thought about this for a bit and came to the conclusion that I have, but not because the codebase knocked my socks off. Instead, the codebase didn't have any of the signs of bad practices. Most everything was where I expected it to be, there was sufficient, but not stifling test and review practices, etc. It felt natural to work within. So I don't think that a good codebase does any one particular thing well, it just avoids the bad parts of bad codebases. Via negativa in practice. |
|
|