[occz]

That's probably not what they meant.

What I interpreted it as was that the current iteration of machine learning will not be able to satisfactorily solve full self-driving cars.

[Traubenfuchs]

> That's probably not what they meant.

It is, somewhat. The current generation of software and hardware was pushed to its limits by the smartest AI/ML engineers in the world and the best we got is Tesla FSD which is in no way ready to replace taxis and still needs someone at the wheel at all times.

100% self driving taxis for drunk night crawlers are not on the horizon anymore.