Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xSxY3fj5gVCmvWE 1418 days ago
What exactly is the useful part, though? I mean, it's technically wrong. I don't see how this description improves layman understanding of cookies, much less to the point of offsetting the wrongness of it. In fact, you could argue "text files" is straight up confusing: you'd expect them to be human-readable, but they're not. They're machine-oriented data, often with several layers of encoding and serialization.

The article was right at the time of writing, and it's even righter today.

2 comments

> What exactly is the useful part, though? I mean, it's technically wrong.

At least in Internet Explorer 3 and Netscape Navigator, cookies were stored as individual files in the file system. In that sense at some point in time it was somewhat correct.

However the relevant part: On e in a time computer users knew files and we're working a lot with them. Operating systems like Windows 95 pushed files into the front (instead of first picking the program and in the program opening the thing they pushed Explorer to "explore the computer" and then finding the right program for the file) There a file was a understandable unit of data.

> it's technically wrong

What would you define a DNS TXT record as? Technically speaking.

> you'd expect them to be human-readable, but they're not

humans are sorta ok at making data readable

https://i.imgur.com/ExMCVsl.png