|
|
|
|
|
by klodolph
1417 days ago
|
|
This has got to be one of the worst takes on IRBs I’ve ever heard. The basic argument here is that rules are ineffective because bad actors ignore them. - Before IRBs, unethical experiments were done by professors and grad students with disposal to all of the resources they normally have. - People don’t always know what the ethical implications of their study is, or how it could negatively impact participants. - The IRBs are not there to stop research. They are there to help people figure out how to conduct research ethically. |
|
IRBs don't need to be ran by anyone more competent than a 5 year old to catch the cases you're talking about. What they have metastasis to today is just another part of the administrative industrial complex which has strangled academia.