[jmfayard]

Yep, assuming there are two equally valid positions for everything, because they have a two-party system, so there must be for every topic a GOP side and a Democrat side. Never mind that both parties have often similar bad policies on any topic, in which case you fool yourself believing to be objective while you are only repeating bipartisan dogma.

"Better than 10 for Hitler and none for anyone else". No, the critics of two-party systems don't want a single party system like Soviet Russia. They want multipartism.

And science has sometimes settled on only one theory. And in other times may have four different competing hypotheses. And other times just no idea whatsoever.

The positive side of both-sideism is that it's very easy. Count the number of sides being presented. Complain if it's not two. Being very lazy myself, I value that.

[Defletter]

I hold the opinion that slavery is bad. I think books that advocate for slavery are abhorrent. I guess the next step really is Soviet Russia. Well done you for pointing that out.