[EarthLaunch]

I think three.js is that.

- All of the above except language

- Library rather than engine

I've had really good luck with it versus Babylon or Unity.

[iFire]

Let's be fair to three.js, the comparison would be to aframe.

https://aframe.io/ or similar projects.

(Godot Engine Maintainer)

[EarthLaunch]

Thank you so much for your work on Godot.

You are right, though I think all three can be compared, depending on the type of project. Unity is on the decline and I would be happy for Godot to become the future for those types of games.

[naet]

Three.js is a 3d graphics library, not a game engine. You can use it to render your game but it doesn't bring the same things as Unity or Babylon.

I have often worked directly with an html canvas and some javascript to make 2d web games. It works well for me and I enjoy it, but I wouldn't call it a "game engine" either.

[peoplefromibiza]

> I think three.js is that.

three.js doesn't produce native multi platform apps for desktop and mobile.

[EarthLaunch]

The mobile builds are its killer app, in my view as a gamedev. Unity has lost the plot in many ways. Desktop builds are important too, but there's competition there if you consider browser/electron as a desktop platform, plus Unreal. But Godot is the exclusive up-and-coming competition in mobile builds (that I am aware of; granted I am not a mobile dev).