[gr1zzlybe4r]

The car dependence in America is so strong, that I think 99% of the population doesn't realize what is possible even with slightly reduced (not eliminated) car dependence.

I grew up in the suburbs and felt *trapped* until I was able to drive. Legitimately didn't feel like I could be independent.

This is most people's experience, whether they realize it or not. I only became aware of what car-less life could be like when I lived in Chicago (the city, not the burbs). Even then it took me a year to realize how convenient everything was because I could mostly walk or bike to what I wanted.

IMO - the resistance to developing density in the US is because people associate independence with the automobile; and it's a very, very deep association. I don't think people understand that density can actually make you more independent because they haven't really experienced it.

And to be clear I don't want to ban cars. More so, just want to see our country have more options for actual cities other than NYC and Chicago.

[moooo99]

> And to be clear I don't want to ban cars. More so, just want to see our country have more options for actual cities other than NYC and Chicago.

I don't think banning cars would even solve the issue. Cars are legitimately a good option for many people. But governments many governments want to pretend cars are a good option for anyone, which is just not true. Transportation modes should be treated equal, depending on the starting position this would necessitate taking back space dedicated to cars.