[dspillett]

> and those behind CG-NAT

I'm in two minds about how I feel inconveniencing those behind CG-NAT. I don't want to punish the innocent, but the ISPs aren't going to move towards better solutions (IPv6) without a push from their paying customers, and they'll never get that push with sufficient strength if we work tirelessly to make the problem affect us and not affect those subscribers.

[2000UltraDeluxe]

In the real world, on the other hand, customers will simply conclude that one site doesn't work while others do, and that the problem must be with the one site that doesn't work.