[evrydayhustling]

FWIW the author is pretty direct about this. After the cute beginning, he basically says that his problem is with Airflow's scope, not it's execution.

[pdinny]

Hence the bait and switch. IMHO increasing the scope of Airflow (or any tool) is a challenging proposition. Would you rather use very few mega-tools with very broad scope (and potentially more challenging domain to navigate) or fewer more specialised tools that interoperate well together?

Obviously there are trade-offs with either approach, but then I'd argue that making Airflow solve more problems will introduce more trade-offs too.

[peteradio]

Having a poor scope is a problem because people will just choose not to use you.