I just don't follow your reasoning here. Is it your contention that a new experience deletes or diminishes previous experiences? Or that newly learnt knowledge diminishes that previously learnt?
Surely a new set of common experiences increases the diversity of thought of all the participants? Nothing's lost.
>Surely a new set of common experiences increases the diversity of thought of all the participants?
This statement is absurd on its face. The entire premise of the benefits of diversity (of thought and experience) is predicated on the subjects in question having had unique experiences.
>Is it your contention that a new experience deletes or diminishes previous experiences?
Somewhat, yes. When I went to university, the shared experiences there hugely overshadowed what I had experienced in my prior education.
We all love to say how true diversity is diversity of experience. You are literally taking about unified, shared experiences.