|
|
|
|
|
by gregdoesit
1418 days ago
|
|
Thanks! This is a tricky one as you already pointed it out. I’m voting for simplicity: capturing the number in the point of time, and also capturing whether the equity component has appreciated or depreciated. My bet is that having the date of the submission plus data on whether this was a new offer plus the indicator of how the equity changed will give a good enough sense for the sake of using this data. |
|
As a software engineer looking to optimize for comp (among others) I'm interested in how reproducible those numbers are. If someone got lucky and their initial grant is now worth several times more that's great for them, but doesn't tell me much about what to expect for myself. I agree that filtering by new offer works best when comparing offers.