|
|
|
|
|
by pjmlp
1425 days ago
|
|
When Michael Abrash wrote his books, C compilers weren't known for the quality of their blazing machine code. It also has a proven record that no matter what, exploits are bound to happen, making the whole industry turn into hardware memory tagging as the ultimate solution to fix C. |
|
But then a lot of people would disagree on "Lets jump on the <new-hot-language> bandwagon ASAP". Even the transition to parts of Linux kernel components in Rust is slow and cautious. In that sense, C is still a wide choice. Plus there are a lot of people actively working on C. Rust is only but picking up. it's more likely people will write buggy code on a new language than something which has been around for a while.