|
|
|
|
|
|
by kaba0
1418 days ago
|
|
|
Well, you can always go a layer below and use a bytebuffer (or its C# equivalent). You can drop it at the end of the task in an instant. But I don’t think that giving up the comfort/performance of a good GC is a good tradeoff in all the other cases. The same way Rust et alia can opt into some form of GC with (A)RC, GC languages can have escape hatches as well. |
|
|