[dragonwriter]

> Function calls (present in C and other structured, procedural, and OO paradigm languages which are also imperative) do not make a language declarative.

“Declarative” and “imperative” are not really features of languages in the first place. They are features of code (and coding paradigms), and you can write code of either style (and usually most paradigms) in almost any real-world, Turing-complete, higher-level-than-assembly language.

The specific replacement of an imperative loop with a map call you made the non-sequitur response about function calls to upthread however, made the code it was in more declarative, though, and is typical of the ways that the functional paradigm (where map is typically the idiomatic way to do that) is more declarative than the structured/procedural paradigm (where building up a collection in an imperative loop would be.)

[eloisius]

Exactly. You could even write declarative style C, or make your code _more_ declarative. It’s not some binary decision. It generally just means writing higher level language describing the result you want, rather than all the instructions to produce it. Functional languages are very good at letting you right declarative code, especially when it comes to dealing with sequences and lists. Ruby’s enumerator in particular allows you to write code in that style, rather than complicated nested for loops full of conditional logic.